Mr. Lions's status in the world of mathematics is no lower than that of Faltings, Wiles and other mathematical masters, and his influence is huge. Moreover, he rarely leaves messages on the Internet. This time, the person who left comments has begun to spread.

Qin Ke's paper, which attracted the attention of countless people, immediately added fuel to the fire, causing the paper to spread at a terrifying speed. Many mathematicians who were still sleeping due to jet lag were woken up by phone calls from their colleagues, and then even their faces turned upside down.

I didn't bother to wash myself, so I rushed to the computer and started to read this paper carefully...

For many scholars who really like mathematics and theoretical physics, a high-quality paper is comparable to the most expensive wine, which makes people indulge in it.

Papers co-authored by "Qin Ke" and "Ning Qingyun", or papers written individually, can basically reach this level.

The number of comment sections of the paper is also growing at an alarming rate, especially under the comments of Mr. Lions, there are more comments.

[Professor Lions is really amazing, he actually finished reading it! I only got through 32 pages, and then I couldn’t understand it at all!]

[It’s a bit embarrassing to say that I, an associate professor of mathematics at New York University, only read 61 pages in one go.]

[Starting from page 47, I kept looking through the references mentioned later and looking up the theorems and formulas involved before I could read on slowly. 】

[Although I have only understood less than one-fifth of it, the exquisite ideas and mathematical processing techniques in it have amazed me and benefited me a lot. There are only two papers in the world that can make me read so much.

Death is like being drunk.]

[I urge you to popularize science or give public academic lectures. The title of this paper is so gorgeous, but the content is unbelievable. I can guarantee that there are only ten mathematicians in the world who can understand it all in the first time!]

[Who are the ten people you mentioned? I’m very curious. At least I just spent four and a half hours watching it for the first time, and I only understood about 80%.]

[666 upstairs, you can actually understand 80%... Damn it, isn't this account ID Professor Tao Zhexuan from the University of California? You can only understand 80%? 】

[Academician Qin and Academician Ning join forces to attack, so terrifying!]

[Although I don’t quite understand it, I can announce loudly that the unification of physics opens a new page from today!]

Although the Yang-Mills equation is not well-known among ordinary people, and most ordinary people do not know what it is, in the world of mathematics and physics, its fame is by no means inferior to that of the N-S equation.

As one of the greatest academic achievements in theoretical physics in the twentieth century, it is an important milestone in the unification of physics and an important theoretical basis for the standard model of particle physics. This article "Proof of the mass gap problem of the Yang-Mills equation and the standard of particle physics"

"Mathematical Explanation of the Model" not only describes the mystery of the mass gap problem from a mathematical perspective, but also reinterprets the standard model of particle physics in mathematical language. Its significance can be imagined.

When the news of this paper was spread back to China, the "Wang School" mathematicians headed by Academician Xue Weikang and Academician Chi Yongjiang were sparing no effort to recommend this paper to their colleagues. The result of the resonance between the two was that various domestic media

, big V, and self-media swarmed in to grab this big academic news that will definitely shock the world.

Mr. Yang, one of the two authors who proposed the "Yang-Mills equation", is currently in China and has also restored Xia's nationality. The mathematician who explained and proved the general solution of this equation and proved the mass gap problem is Xia.

The domestic response to domestic mathematicians can only be described in one word - "carnival"!

Yes, carnival.

It even surpassed the sensation caused when the general solution of the N-S equation was released.

After all, for the domestic people, not many people know what the N-S equation is. Although not many people can clearly explain what the "Yang-Mills equation" specifically says, but as long as you know, it is the work of us Xia people.

Just come out with great academic achievements that the whole world looks up to!

What's more, the one who completed it was Academician Qin Ke and Academician Ning Qingyun, who are currently the most popular and most watched in the country!

The people's patriotism, national pride, and cultural self-confidence, stimulated by this news, produced a violent chemical reaction. The secretion of dopamine increased several times in an instant, prompting the hypothalamus and pituitary gland to transmit more

information of joy and excitement.

So Xia Guo, who was still in the daytime, soon fell into a carnival-like excitement, which can best be seen on the developed Internet.

Almost all major media have begun to launch an overwhelming propaganda to explain what is the Yang-Mills theory, what is the Yang-Mills equation, what is the mass gap, what is the standard model of particle physics, and what is the significance of the mathematical interpretation of this issue...

Even many self-media people who have not graduated from college come to join in the fun, and they dare to brag about something just by searching for it.

As a result, Xia Guo suddenly entered the realm where everyone is a scientist. When getting off work in the evening, if I didn't talk about "Yang-Mills Equation" with my colleagues, I would be embarrassed to say that I was from Xia Guo.

The most exaggerated headlines on the Internet.

"Their brains have surpassed supercomputers!"

"The IQ of this young couple is as high as 10,000 scientists!"

"The greatest scientist in history in mathematics and physics, surpassing Newton, surpassing Einstein, and transcending the universe" - why only Newton and Einstein are mentioned here, and an inexplicable "universe" is added? That is because of the author of this title

I was a first-year junior high school student, and the only two physicists I remember were two.

The replies from netizens were equally joyful:

[Academician Ning solved a millennium mathematical problem with her husband while she was still pregnant, which is amazing!]

[Whoever calls someone stupid after being pregnant for three years, I will use this example to slap them in the face! Look at Academician Ning, it is obvious that his IQ is still at its peak! 】

[It’s been less than two months since they won the Nobel Prize, right? Some time ago, they upgraded navigation for the domestic aviation industry to avoid air crashes... For such amazing scientists, I can only say one thing -

It’s great that they are Xia people, I will always be proud of them!]

This chapter is not finished yet, please click on the next page to continue reading the exciting content! [Invincible in the world, a national treasure!]

[Well, today is another day when Qin Shen and Ning shocked the world. Hey, why did I say "again"? 】

[The theory proposed by Xia Guo scientists was completed and interpreted by Xia Guo scientists, perfect!]

[I don’t know what the unification of physics is. Anyway, I just know that they have done something awesome again, right? 】

Of course, there are also some weird voices on the Internet, mainly because the paper is too difficult.

For example - "This paper is too difficult. There is no point in writing such a difficult paper. If an academic result cannot be understood by most people, how much impact can it have on the progress of mankind?"

"I only saw 'showing off' in the whole paper, showing off knowledge, showing off level, and pretending to be mysterious. Why can't you explain your theory like a popular science book? In the final analysis, your level is still not good, right?"

"Our professors all said they couldn't understand it. Ha, I'm surprised. Who should write a paper that no one can understand? If they have the ability, they can review it and publish it themselves!"

Such negative comments were naturally sprayed by fans of Qin Ke and Ning Qingyun.

[Haha, you are not good enough and you still want others to accommodate you? Who do you think you are?]

[This is the most brainless low-level hacker I have ever seen. Academician Ning, the hacker Qin academician, is so advanced that you can’t understand the paper? Why don’t you pee and take a picture of how much you weigh? 】

[Academician Qin and Academician Ning are top scientists, not popular science writers. They have no obligation to popularize the most profound academic results, and there is no need to do so. Rather than letting them accommodate the vast majority, it is better to let them continue to lead the world and guide human civilization.

Progress is more practical! Just like Riemann, Euler, and Gauss, their works were published more than a hundred years ago, and they are still allowing the mathematical community to continue to explore and benefit from them. This is what top mathematicians should do!

】

Just as the online scoldings continued and the quarrel broke out, a reporter from the Times Herald contacted Professor Trowitch of CERN for an interview.

CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research, is the largest particle physics laboratory in the world and one of the most authoritative institutions in particle physics. For a long time, even if scientists from Xia State were able to work in it, they could only serve as "side jobs".

” role has no right to participate in the core and most critical large-scale accelerator experiments.

Therefore, CERN’s views on this mathematical paper related to particle physics, co-authored by scientist Xia Guo and attracting the attention of countless people, has become a very hot news point.

From this perspective, the Times Herald Academic is indeed extremely journalistic.

Professor Trowitch is a well-known particle physicist at CERN. Unlike most scientists who are immersed in research, he likes to make comments online and has always regarded himself as an authority on particle physicists. The reporter contacted a circle of experts at CERN

, only he was willing to be interviewed.

The reporter asked: "Professor Trowitch, have you noticed any major news at CERN? The famous Xiaguo scientists Academician Qin Ke and Academician Ning Qingjun uploaded a paper titled "The Mass Gap of the Yang-Mills Equation" a day ago.

"Problem Proof and Mathematical Interpretation of the Standard Model of Particle Physics" is a preprinted paper, which provides a new interpretation of the Standard Model of Particle Physics using mathematical language."

The bald old professor, who had almost lost all his hair, nodded slightly arrogantly: "We have indeed heard of this paper."

The reporter immediately asked: "What do you think of this paper, which is said to have a profound impact on the development of particle physics?"

"Currently, most of our colleagues who are interested in this paper are still researching it. I don't know what they think. CERN has not specifically commented on this matter, but from my personal point of view, this paper has many problems."

The reporter quickly took notes: "What do you think is wrong?"

"I will not comment on the mathematics part. I am not a mathematician and cannot understand so many mathematical terms and mathematical calculations. But I understand one thing. At the end of this paper, the two young

Xia Guo, winner of the Fields Medal, used mathematical formulas to calculate the W boson's mass using the mass of the Higgs boson, the mass of the Z boson, the mass of the top quark, and the lifespan of the muon through the mass relationship discovered in the paper.

The mass is 80466 MeV/c^2.”

The reporter asked curiously: "Is there any problem with this?"

Professor Trovich chuckled softly and said: "The biggest problem is here. This value is inconsistent with the results calculated by our CERN through the standard model theory of particle physics. It is also inconsistent with the most accurate value measured by CERN so far, 80433.5±9.4 MeV/c^

2 also has a large difference, with 7 standard deviations between the two. As a physicist, it is difficult for me to believe that a completely correct value can be obtained by mathematical calculations alone, let alone that this value is consistent with

CERN's original calculations and experimental measurements are quite different."

The reporter puzzled: "This is also explained in the paper. Regarding this unusual numerical deviation, Academician Qin and Academician Ning proposed the need for new revisions to the Standard Model of Particle Physics, such as the introduction of new physics. They thought it was the rumored

Dark matter causes deviations between theoretically calculated values ​​and experimental measurements at the Large Electron Positron Collider and the Large Hadron Collider."

"Dark matter?" Professor Trowitch scoffed: "Over the years, we have been conducting high-energy particle collision experiments to try to produce dark matter particles, but there has not yet been any direct detection evidence of the existence of dark matter. It can be said that dark matter is still only a theoretical proposal.

It is an invisible substance that may exist in the universe. They want to prove that dark matter exists just based on theoretical calculations in a paper?"

The reporter said: "The two academicians just put forward a hypothesis and did not prove it..."

"Anyway, that's pretty much what it means. I never think that without experiments, we can draw correct conclusions just by relying on mathematicians' writing and calculations. If this is the case, what do we physicists have to do? This world only needs

Just be a mathematician."

The reporter actually wanted to say that the two great mathematicians from Xia State were actually great physicists, and they were super experts who had won the Nobel Prize in Physics. However, when they saw Professor Trovich’s jealous and resentful look,

, but he still swallowed his words, especially when Professor Trowitch added another piece of exciting news:

"Last year, when we at CERN conducted the toroidal instrument experiment and the compact muon coil experiment, we obtained the first evidence of the decay of the Higgs boson into Z bosons and photons. We will re-enable it soon.

The Large Hadron Collider (LHC), which has undergone minor upgrades, will once again accurately test the mass of the W boson. At the same time, a new round of toroidal instrument experiments and compact muon coil experiments may be launched.

We will discover new particles beyond the predictions of the standard model of particle physics, officially opening the door to new physics! Experiments are the key to the future of particle physics, not so-called theoretical calculations that not many people can understand!"

…

This interview with the Times Herald was published that night. Many media outlets did not take it too seriously when forwarding it, directly mistaking Professor Trowitch's statement for CERN's statement, and various sensational headlines were born.

:

"CERN believes that there are major problems in the papers of Xia Guo, two mathematics masters, and they are inconsistent with their particle physics experimental results!"

"CERN does not agree with the views of the popular paper and restarted the Large Hadron Collider experiment in order to overturn the paper of the two Xia scientists!"

"CERN: Experimentation is the key to the future of particle physics!"
Chapter completed!